UPDTAE: SELECTION CRITERIA CONFIRMED
This afternoon the National Inquiry's press team emailed me a link to a document titled Local Area Investigation Selection Criteria. It sits on the Documents page of the Inquiry's website, dated 24 June 2026.

My article stated that no selection criteria had been published. I was wrong, and I correct it here without qualification. The document exists. I had missed it.

The criteria were placed on a documents page, on the same day the Inquiry announced its first investigation areas, in a batch alongside costs protocols and technical guidance. I can find no press release accompanied them. Nor any announcement mentioning them.
I have been back through the national coverage of 24 June, from the Press Association wire to the broadcasters, and I cannot find one report that references a selection criteria document.
The Inquiry's own announcement yesterday, published on the very day its Terms of Reference required the criteria to be public, does not mention them either. The most consequential document this Inquiry will produce, the one deciding which towns and cities are investigated and which are passed over, was published in a manner where most people would miss it. It worked.
I have now read the document the Inquiry was so careful not to draw attention to. Tomorrow I will take you through it, paragraph by paragraph. What I have to share with you is far worse than not publishing a selection criteria.
Raja Miah MBE
Eight Years Later
We are not where we are by accident. Every column inch, every FOI, every hearing forced into existence, came from years of refusing to stop. From paying a price that most would not.
We will not get where we need to be if we leave the job to the people who built the cover-up in the first place. Stand with me.
This work is free because the truth has to circulate. Anyone can read it, share it, act on it, without paying a penny. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. Governments do not fear facts. Facts get filed, minimised, managed. What governments fear is scale.
Burnham and the Labour Party do not fear one campaigner. They fear thousands of readers, sharing the same work, backing the same investigation, because numbers mean witnesses, numbers mean pressure, numbers mean consequences they cannot manage away.
Every subscriber is a number they cannot erase. Every reader widens a circle they cannot control. A handful of supporters can be dismissed as noise. Thousands cannot. This is how the campaign survives. This is how we see it through to the end. This is how voices like ours stop being managed and start being feared.
Before Burnham reaches Number 10, Red Wall and the Rabble needs 2,000 paid subscribers. That's the scale of what's coming. Today, we are 25% of the way there..
Sign Up Now. Help force Andy Burnham testify at the National Inquiry.
Raja Miah MBE
