THE NATIONAL INQUIRY CANNOT SAY WHAT HAPPENED, WHO ALLOWED IT OR WHY

THE NATIONAL INQUIRY CANNOT SAY WHAT HAPPENED, WHO ALLOWED IT OR WHY

Last Friday, the Grooming Gang National Inquiry sneaked out its first newsletter. You can read it here;

August 2026 Newsletter – The Statutory Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs

Fourteen months after Starmer was forced to announce it, this is how the Inquiry describes its purpose.

"The Inquiry is laser-focused on finding answers to the question of why this was allowed to happen, and continue to happen, and ensuring it cannot be allowed to happen in the future."

What was allowed to happen? The National Inquiry will not say. Maybe they need reminding of what they are actually inquiring into?

Little White girls were drugged, raped and trafficked by organised networks of predominantly Pakistani men. Those responsible for protecting children knew what was taking place and allowed it to continue. When others spoke out, they were demonised as racists, and when the authorities were finally forced to investigate, they covered up what took place.

In two thousand words the Inquiry does not once come anywhere near saying what took place. They call it "this".

Next. Who 'allowed' 'this' what to 'happen'? "Allowed" appears twice in that sentence, "happen" three times, and not once is a single name attached.

The politicians who took the votes have names and political parties they belong to. The police commanders who closed the operations have names. The council officers who buried the reports have names. The reporters and media outlets that helped hide what was taking place have names. The communities the men come from have names. The cultural, religious and social conditions have names. They all have names

We get no names from the national inquiry. Not even the names of the groups that the 'who' belong to.

As for the question of why was this allowed to happen? We all know why. So does the national inquiry. They dare not reference any of this.

  • Because the children were traded for votes. The men belonged to networks that delivered elections and everyone who mattered knew it.
  • Because a commitment to multiculturalism meant maintaining community relations mattered more than the screams of little girls.
  • Because race relations and community cohesion policies turned looking away into a funded programme, with budgets, officers and awards for the people who kept the peace.
The Inquiry cannot answer its own question without naming that bargain, and it will not. It dare not.

I know all about cover ups. Fundamental to every cover up is the language it uses. Language that names no crime, no perpetrator and no decision protects everyone who took a decision.

"This was allowed to happen" is not a sentence written for survivors. It is a sentence written by people describing something they intend to survive.

They had fourteen months and £65m to write one honest sentence. They chose this one instead.Now watch what I do with the rest of their August newsletter. A full article will follow.

Having helped force the national inquiry, I now scrutinise every word this Inquiry publishes. We all know, left to it's own devices, the National Inquiry will be a cover up. What I hope can be achieved through my analysis, with your support in amplifying me, is to limit the cover up and force from the National Inquiry at least some of the truths it was designed to bury.

I'm eight years in to this work. It is not something I chose to do. I spent three years on police bail whilst the authorities tried to put me in prison to stop the truth of the cover up from coming out. Read my work, listen to my analysis, and you will understand why even the Prime Minister ran away from facing me.

I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. And with your help, we will force this to a place where they are forced to pay a price for what they did.

If you are one of the 100,000 that read my newsletter and are yet to do so, please sign up and support me. A paid subscription if you can afford to do so, free otherwise.

Raja Miah MBE

Over 10,000 of you will read what I publish for free every day.

That matters to me. I want this investigation to reach far beyond the people who can afford to pay. But producing thirty parts across twenty-eight days takes time, research, interviews, documents and complete independence from the institutions I am investigating.

That independence is funded by paid subscribers. Only a handful of readers upgraded yesterday. That is not enough to sustain work on this scale.

I am not asking those who cannot afford it. Keep reading. Keep sharing. Help this reach the people who need to see it. But if you read this publication every day, value the work and can afford to support it, please upgrade now.

Do not leave it to somebody else.

Your paid subscription funds the campaign. It keeps the articles free for thousands of others. And it allows me to follow the evidence wherever it leads, without permission, compromise or fear.

Sign up or upgrade to paid today.

If you cannot afford the £3 a month or £30 for the full year, just sign up for free.

There are no paywalls to access any of my work. I publish everything for free.
If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links;

👉 http://BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
👉 http://paypal.me/RecusantNine

Should we succeed, politicians will go to prison. Even if there is only the smallest chance of this happening, isn't it worth your support?
Raja Miah MBE