The Grooming Gang Inquiry Implodes As Both Shortlisted Chairs Quit Following Survivor Revolt

Ministers accused of trying to rig the process as survivors expose hidden political ties and walk away from a “toxic, silencing machine.”

The grooming gang inquiry has descended into chaos, with both candidates for chair and multiple survivors quitting in disgust. What was promised as a “survivor-led” investigation now lies in ruins, accused of being manipulated, censored, and politically rigged from the start.

The resignation of "Jess" (not her real name) follows the departure of three other survivors: Fiona Goddard, Ellie-Ann Reynolds, and Elizabeth Harper. Their withdrawals show the growing fight between survivors and ministers over how the inquiry is being run.

The exodus destroys the credibility of an inquiry that was promised to be "survivor led" but which critics now say has been taken over by the same officials who failed victims for decades.

Minister Under Fire

Jess Phillips, the Minister for Safeguarding, now faces growing calls for her resignation after survivors accused her of lying about their role in the process.

Messages released by Fiona Goddard show the minister privately acknowledged discussions she later denied in Parliament and in a letter to the Home Affairs Committee. Documents reveal that survivors were told they would have meaningful influence over the investigation's direction, only to discover they were operating within a "controlled environment" where dissenting voices were marginalised or ignored.

The row centres on what survivors say was a complete lie about their role. They believed they would be helping to shape the inquiry. Instead, they found themselves stuck in a managed group with no real power, banned from speaking publicly. Some survivors call these restrictions gagging orders.

Prime Ministers Questions today shows the scale of government failure and the determination of women who refused to be silenced. The resignations prove that ministers, not survivors, are running this inquiry.

Survivors Gagged and Sidelined

Sources close to the inquiry say officials have been controlling and restricting survivors from the start. Panel members say they were banned from talking to journalists, and their suggestions were watered down or blocked by civil servants.

The Home Office had said the survivors' panel would be the heart of a truly "victim-led" inquiry. But the resignations show this was just words. One survivor called it "a tick-box exercise" designed to look good rather than give survivors any real say.

These women were promised they would finally have a voice after decades of being ignored. Instead, they found themselves trapped in a system designed to control them, just like the one that allowed abuse to happen in the first place.

Decades of Cover-Ups

The grooming gang inquiry was established after decades of institutional neglect. Multiple investigations have revealed how local authorities, police forces, and social services repeatedly failed to protect vulnerable children, often prioritising political sensitivity or community relations over child safety in towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Oldham and Oxford.

This latest crisis will only confirm what many already suspect. That those in power still refuse to admit how badly they failed.

Survivors and campaigners say it is the same story every time. Officials promise to listen, then shut them down. The result, they argue, is another betrayal from the same people who put protecting reputations before protecting children.

The inquiry was meant to be different. A chance for accountability. It was meant to be a space where survivors could finally speak without fear or censorship. Instead, many now feel they have been deceived again. The illusion of empowerment masking another exercise in control.

MPs Demand Phillips Goes

Opposition MPs have joined survivor advocates in calling for Jess Phillips to resign, arguing that her position has become untenable. If she refuses, they say, the Prime Minister and Home Secretary must remove her.

"What has been done to these survivors is disgraceful, and that was before Phillips accused them of lying. The evidence released by Fiona Goddard is conclusive. It is the Minister for Safeguarding who has lied, not the survivors."

The government now faces a damaging choice. Removing Phillips would admit failure. Keeping her risks further resignations and the complete collapse of confidence in the inquiry. Both options threaten the government.

Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, has attempted to steady the situation, pledging that the inquiry "will not be watered down" and will "explicitly examine the ethnicity and religion of offenders." Yet her reassurances are meaningless while survivor after survivor walks away, alleging censorship and dishonesty.

Leadership Vacuum Deepens

The crisis has now reached the top of the inquiry. Both leading candidates for chair have withdrawn, leaving the government’s flagship investigation leaderless and discredited.

Annie Hudson, a respected social-care expert, pulled out earlier this week after what officials described as “intense media coverage.” Then, on Wednesday, Jim Gamble, the former head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), also stepped down.

In a letter to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Gamble said he could not continue without the trust of survivors:

“It is clear that a lack of confidence due to my previous occupation exists among some,” he wrote. “I made a commitment that if this consensus of trust was not present, I would not proceed, and I must now be true to my word.”

But survivors and campaigners say that official explanation conceals the real reason behind his withdrawal. Gamble’s long-standing ties to the Labour Party, including his past as an activist and party member, had been kept out of the public record by both government officials and mainstream media outlets.

Over the weekend, the government attempted to quietly install him as chair of the inquiry. Every major news outlet knew of his political affiliation and every one of them stayed silent. The connection was not overlooked. It was buried.

When the information was finally exposed publicly, outrage erupted. Survivors and members of the public accused ministers of trying to “rig the inquiry” by appointing a politically aligned figure to lead an investigation that demanded absolute independence.

“This didn’t happen by accident,” said one campaigner. “They tried to sneak him in. The public saw it, spoke up, and forced them to back down.”

With both Hudson and Gamble gone, the inquiry is now adrift — stripped of credibility and direction. The Home Office insists it is “exploring a range of other candidates” and remains committed to a “full, statutory, national inquiry.” But survivors say such assurances are meaningless when even those chosen to lead the process can no longer defend its integrity.

“If the people at the top are walking away, what chance do survivors have?” another campaigner said. “It’s a toxic process — and it’s falling apart.”

Inquiry on Brink of Collapse

The inquiry's viability is now in question. With multiple survivors withdrawing cooperation, its legitimacy among affected communities has been destroyed. Legal experts warn the exodus could force a complete restructuring, including the appointment of an independent chair free from any connection to institutions implicated in the original failures.

For the survivors who remain, the choice is stark. Stay and risk being complicit in a managed process, or leave and risk losing the only official platform available to demand accountability.

The crisis raises a question far bigger than this inquiry. Can the British state ever investigate its own failures honestly? Time after time, from grooming gangs to Grenfell to Covid, the pattern is the same. Promises of truth, followed by bureaucratic obstruction, political interference, and a quiet burial of evidence.

So far, the Home Office has offered no detailed response to the resignations or to the allegations of censorship. Its previous pledges to listen to victims and learn lessons now sound like a script, recited by institutions incapable of introspection.

This inquiry has failed. But its collapse has done something that years of official reports never achieved. It has exposed, in real time, how the system protects itself. Survivors were not defeated this time; they walked away rather than be used. Chairs refused to lend their names to a rigged process. The public saw what was being done and refused to look away.

If Jess Phillips will not resign, she must be sacked. But her departure alone will not be enough. Accountability must reach beyond one minister to the entire culture of evasion that allowed this betrayal to happen.

Britain has asked survivors to relive their trauma yet again, not to deliver justice, but to protect those in power from scrutiny. What the country owes them now is not another review, not another apology, but the one thing they have never truly been given, the truth, told without fear or favour.

For seven years, I’ve been exposing how politicians protected the Pakistani Rape Gangs and silenced their little White victims.

In that time, the police have tried and failed to prosecute me. Politicians have tried and failed to sue me. Gangsters and Islamists have openly called for my murder.

I don’t put my work behind paywalls. Every word I write is free for anyone who still believes that the truth sets us free.

If my content has ever helped you make sense of this broken system, or made you feel less alone in it, I ask one small thing:

🔴 Support the work. This fight is far from over.

Subscribe Now

Prefer a one-off contribution?
👉 http://BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
👉 http://paypal.me/RecusantNine

Your support keeps this fight alive and this truth in the light.

- Raja 🙏