THE IDEOLOGY THEY DARE NOT NAME

They’d Rather You Die Than Admit They’re Wrong

Three men convicted of terror plot. Target explicitly Jewish.

Here is the official Greater Manchester Police statement. Something's missing. The ideology that drove them. Not hinted at. Not mentioned. Completely absent. This isn't incompetence. It's deliberate policy.

GMP talks about "hate" and "extremism" and "antisemitic intent" but won't name the belief system behind those ideas. The public gets scraps. Violence without explanation. Attempted mass murder without context.

But ideology explains everything. Why Jews were targeted. Why civilians were acceptable. Why thousands, not dozens.

GMP won't say it. Even Sir Stephen Watson refuses to name it. So I will.

The Worldview They Refuse to Name

This is radical Islam. These men were jihadists.

I've spent decades fighting this ideology across British towns. What I'm about to tell you isn't my interpretation. It's their doctrine.

Believers versus enemies Within this worldview, humanity is divided into believers and non-believers. Non-Muslim lives are conditional. Valuable only through conversion or submission. Mass civilian slaughter is virtuous, not criminal.

Rejection of secular authority Democracy, human rights, British courts, our legal system. All viewed as illegitimate man-made systems defying divine law. The goal isn't reform but replacement of our entire political system with Islamic governance. Violence against secular authority is obedience, not rebellion.

Jihad as armed struggle Not metaphorical struggle but physical warfare commanded by God. Killing non-Muslims becomes worship. Dying while killing guarantees paradise. Every moral restraint we understand disappears.

Group identity targeting Victims are chosen for who they are, not what they've done. Jewish? Target. Supporting secular democracy? Target. Personal views don't matter. Group membership determines fate. Thousands targeted, not specific individuals.

Jews as theological enemies Not incidental victims but central enemies. In jihadist theology, Jews are portrayed as agents of Satan, corrupters of divine will, obstacles requiring elimination. Within jihadist doctrine, violence against Jews is framed as religious duty.

Violence rewards and scale Greater carnage means greater spiritual reward. Each death cleanses sin, elevates status, increases paradise benefits. Mass casualty attacks are preferred because more victims equal higher divine approval.

Terror as strategy Public fear isn't collateral damage but a primary objective. Breaking civilian confidence in state protection is the goal. The deaths are method. Terror is the weapon.

Sacred deception When Muslims are minorities, the ideology permits taqiyya. Deception in service of faith. Public condemnation while private support. Victim narratives when expedient. Allows for tactical dishonesty when they're weak.

How GMP Erases Reality

Every single element gets scrubbed.

1. Believers vs enemies Within this worldview, humanity is divided into believers and enemies. Non-Muslims aren't fellow humans but targets whose lives have no inherent worth. Mass murder is virtuous, not criminal. GMP erases this completely. Talks about "the public" and "the community." Pretends these men saw Jewish civilians as fellow citizens rather than religious enemies. The enemy classification disappears.
2. Rejection of secular law These men didn't break British law. They rejected its legitimacy entirely. Democracy, human rights, courts, police, citizenship. All illegitimate systems defying divine law. Our entire legal system has no authority over true believers. This isn't criminality but theological rebellion against Britain itself. GMP frames it as ordinary crime. Suggests these men accepted our legal system but chose to break it. The total rejection of our society vanishes.
3. Armed religious duty Jihad isn't metaphorical or spiritual. It's armed struggle commanded by God. Killing isn't criminal but worship. Dying while killing isn't tragedy but martyrdom guaranteeing paradise. Violence has divine sanction. GMP reduces this to "terrorism" and "extremism." Generic words for any political violence. The theological core disappears completely.
4. Group targeting No distinction between combatants and civilians. Jews, non-Muslims, supporters of secular systems. All legitimate targets for who they are, not what they've done. Mass civilian slaughter isn't collateral damage but the point. GMP offers "risk to the public." Sounds like general threat rather than specific religious slaughter. The justification for murdering innocents vanishes.
5. Jews as theological enemies Not casual antisemitism or racial prejudice. Theological hatred placing Jews at the centre of cosmic war between God and Satan. Jews are eternal enemies of divine will, corrupters of humanity, obstacles to eliminate. Jewish targets recur constantly. The violence is obsessive, eliminationist. GMP manages one word. "Antisemitic." No explanation of the theology making Jewish genocide a religious duty.
6. Violence rewards Scale wasn't random. Thousands targeted because greater carnage means greater spiritual reward. Each death cleanses sin, elevates status, increases paradise rewards. Extremity is the point. Restraint reduces benefit. Mass casualty beats selective targeting. GMP offers no explanation for why thousands over dozens. The religious incentive structure vanishes.
7. Terror strategy Public fear isn't unfortunate consequence but the primary weapon. Horror, panic, societal disruption count as success. Goal isn't just killing but breaking public morale and faith in state protection. Terror is strategy, not side effect. GMP treats fear as regrettable collateral damage rather than intended outcome. The psychological warfare element disappears.
8. Sacred deception When Muslims are minorities, the ideology permits taqiyya. Sacred deception in service of faith. Public condemnation of terrorism while privately supporting it. Victim narratives when expedient. Peaceful rhetoric while building strength. GMP accepts public condemnations at face value. Omits doctrinal permission for tactical dishonesty.

The result is every pillar of the ideology is replaced with management speak. Cause is erased. Structure is flattened. The doctrine is deleted.

What emerges is violence without meaning. Attacks without context. Horror without explanation. GMP's statement makes it sound like these men just randomly decided to kill Jews. The public gets terrorism as natural disaster rather than ideological warfare.

Every theological element that explains targeting, methods, and motivations gets carefully removed. Every doctrinal framework that makes this violence predictable rather than random disappears. Every religious justification that transforms murder into martyrdom vanishes.

The result is a public that cannot understand what it faces. Cannot predict where it will strike next. Cannot demand effective responses because it doesn't comprehend what drives the threat. Citizens are left ignorant while officials control the narrative.

GMP's sanitised language serves no one except the institutions that issue it. Certainly not the Jewish community targeted for theological extermination. Certainly not the British public living under ideological assault. Certainly not the Muslim citizens who reject this extremist interpretation but get conflated with it through institutional refusal to make distinctions.

The only beneficiaries are the police forces, politicians, and civil servants who can appear responsive without confronting uncomfortable realities. Who can manage community relations without addressing root causes. Who can avoid accountability by pretending this violence emerges from nowhere.

Why Institutions Do This

Naming radical Islam forces uncomfortable institutional admissions. This violence isn't random but doctrinal. Not isolated but part of established patterns. Not unpredictable but following recognisable templates.

Honesty demands explanation for ignored warnings, unprotected communities, unchallenged ideology. Institutions that built careers managing rather than solving this problem cannot afford that level of accountability.

But there's a deeper reason. Naming radical Islam shatters the multicultural project these institutions exist to protect. Admitting that this ideology is fundamentally incompatible with liberal democracy destroys decades of policy based on the assumption that all cultures are equally compatible with our values.

Courts face different pressures than public statements. Legal process demands intent be explained because sentences depend on understanding motivation. Evidence must be presented. Ideological frameworks must be examined.

Public statements face political constraints. Must manage community relations, avoid "stigmatising" language, maintain the fiction these attacks emerge from nowhere. The gap between what courts say and what police say shows you where institutional priorities really are.

British institutions operate a two-tier truth system. In court, legal necessity demands full ideological reality. In public, political considerations sanitise that reality beyond recognition. Not accidental but deliberate information control serving institutional over public interests.

The Cost

Institutional lying serves only one constituency - the institutions themselves. It allows the police to appear responsive without confronting uncomfortable truths. It enables politicians to express concern without demanding difficult answers.

Look at what protecting multicultural ideology actually costs.

1. Public Safety Jewish communities live under threat they can't properly understand or prepare for. When institutions refuse to name the ideology targeting them, they can't assess the real level of danger. Can't demand appropriate protection. Can't understand why they're being hunted with such obsessive hatred.

Meanwhile, the ideology continues operating. New recruits absorb the same doctrine. New targets selected using same criteria. New attacks planned with same justifications. Counter-terrorism is impossible when the ideology driving terrorism can't be mentioned.

2. Democratic Accountability Citizens are left ignorant while officials remain comfortable. They can't make informed decisions about security, integration, or counter-terrorism policy without understanding what actually drives this violence. Democracy means nothing when voters don't have the information they need to hold government accountable.

You can't vote intelligently on immigration policy if you don't understand which ideologies immigration sometimes imports. Can't assess integration programs if you're not allowed to know what some communities refuse to integrate with.

3. Muslim Communities The institutional refusal to distinguish between radical Islam and mainstream Muslim practice actually harms ordinary Muslim citizens more than honesty would. When officials treat all forms of Islam as equivalent, they suggest the distinction can't be made. This conflation stigmatises every Muslim rather than isolating the extremists.

The communities most damaged by radical Islam - moderate Muslims, ex-Muslims, Muslim women seeking equality - watch their struggles erased to protect an ideology that terrorises them. Institutional sensitivity serves extremists, not the communities it claims to protect.

Three men attempted mass murder. The ideology that drove them continues recruiting, planning, targeting. And institutions continue protecting that ideology by refusing to name it.

Tell the truth or watch more people die. That's the choice. Three men. One plot. Thousands targeted. One ideology. And institutions determined to sacrifice your safety to protect their beliefs.

I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists.

My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale.

Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters.

🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control.

If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot.

This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared.

🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution?
👉 http://BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
👉 http://paypal.me/RecusantNine

No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible.

We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you.

– Raja Miah MBE