Seven Days of Surrender

When Starmer’s government declared war on the public

This past week proved that British institutions view ordinary citizens as the enemy. Not criminals. Not terrorists. Not foreign agents. You. The enemy.

Police banned Jewish football fans while protecting the Islamists threatening to kill them.
A diversity panel recruited a child rapist to the Met Police despite knowing he'd raped a child.
The UAE pulled their students from British universities because of jihadi recruitment.
Civil servants announced they'll sabotage any Reform government.
Elections got delayed where Reform might win.
Ministers threatened to shut down X for allowing free speech.
Labour scrapped jury trials because ordinary people can't be trusted.

Seven days. Seven surrenders to criminals and extremists. Seven attacks on the British public.

They know exactly who the real enemy is. It's not the jihadists or the child rapists. It's you.

When Police Surrender to Islamist Threats

West Midlands Police banned Israeli football fans from a Birmingham match. The official reason? "Public order risk."

Police produced false evidence to retrospectively justify banning Israeli fans from an away fixture in Britain after the move was agreed. The force drew up the “intelligence” after the local council privately said it had been “challenged” over the decision and needed a clearer “rationale”.

Approached for comment on the new documents, West Midlands police said it did not “have any more updates”. The council did not reply. - The Times

The real reason was different. Intelligence showed Islamist extremists planned to target Jewish supporters. This intelligence was later corroborated by partner authorities and quietly downplayed in public briefings.

So what did the police do? Restrict the Jews, not the jihadists.

It's the same logic that tells rape victims to stay indoors while rapists roam free. Yet again, when criminal networks from within the Muslim communities threaten violence, institutions choose appeasement over arrests. Every single time.

I've seen it before in Oldham. Police arresting me repeatedly rather than the ones openly inciting my murder for exposing the rape gangs and political collusion in the cover-up.

When Pakistani councillors faced exposure for protecting grooming gangs, the council's response wasn't to investigate the allegations. It was to have me arrested. Three times.

The pattern never varies. When institutions face a choice between confronting Muslim sectarians and Islamists or silencing those who expose them, they choose silence.

When Police Become the Predators

Take Cliff Mitchell. He was allowed to join the Metropolitan Police in 2020 after a vetting panel obsessed with diversity targets overturned his rejection despite accusations he'd raped a child. Mitchell went on to become a convicted serial rapist. Life imprisonment.

Then there's David Carrick. Thirty-seven life sentences. Also waved through despite domestic abuse allegations.

The numbers are staggering. Internal panels overturned 114 vetting refusals. Twenty-five of those officers went on to commit crimes or misconduct. Over 5,000 police weren't properly vetted at all. No one has been held responsible for letting loose dangerous criminals as police officers onto the streets of our capital. No on in power dares ask the question, if this is happening in London, where else are the police doing the same?

When diversity quotas matter more than children's lives, you get child rapists with warrant cards. Ideology trumped safeguarding at every level.

Rotherham shows where this all leads. Five survivors have now testified that police investigating grooming gangs were themselves raping children as young as 12. One victim was raped by a serving South Yorkshire Police officer in a marked car, threatened that he would hand her back to the gang if she refused.

Officers sold girls for drugs and money. They supplied drugs directly to the gangs. When one victim tried reporting abuse, an officer ripped up her statement and binned it. The people meant to protect children were trafficking them.

When Your Own Allies Treat You as a Terrorist State

The UAE quietly removed British universities from approved student lists. Not over academic standards, over Islamist radicalisation on UK campuses. Think about that. A Middle Eastern ally has concluded that British institutions can't protect Arab students from extremist recruitment.

The UAE knows what Islamists are. They know jihad, they know the Muslim Brotherhood. And they can see what British officials refuse to acknowledge.

Pakistani sectarians and Islamists now sit as MPs. The government's being systematically blackmailed to criminalise criticism through "Islamophobia" laws. Labour Party Ministers are terrified of losing Muslim bloc votes.

When foreign allies start pulling students because they fear jihadist recruitment, and your response is discussing Islamophobia laws rather than addressing radicalisation, the inversion is complete.

Civil Servants Declare War on Democracy

Whitehall officials are openly signalling they'll resist policies from a Reform government. Not illegal policies, policies they ideologically oppose.

This follows Reform UK's plans, outlined by efficiency tsar Danny Kruger, of cutting the civil service headcount by 30%, replacing permanent secretaries with external appointees, and reforming the Civil Service Code to remove the obligation to comply with international law in ministerial decision-making. These proposals have been met with criticism from civil service unions, who argue they threaten the principle of an impartial civil service and risk "American-style politicisation".

**When Elections Become "Inconvenient"**

Local elections are being delayed in areas where Reform is forecast to surge. The official reason? "Reorganisation and capacity." The real reason is simple. The wrong people might win.

They're not even hiding the pattern anymore. Areas where the establishment faces genuine challenge suddenly need "reorganisation." Areas where compliant candidates will win? They proceed as normal. Democracy becomes conditional on producing acceptable outcomes.

The people who couldn't stop rape gangs are expert at stopping voters.

They know exactly which levers to pull, which excuses to make, which procedures to invoke. Electoral manipulation disguised as administrative efficiency.

We've seen this script before. In Oldham, when our campaign started winning, when we'd forced out three Labour leaders and taken the council to no overall control, suddenly procedures started being changed. Legal threats appeared. I was even arrested to try and prevent me from campaigning in an election.

It was remarkable, really. The same institutional flexibility that couldn't find resources to protect children magically discovered unlimited capacity to obstruct democratic accountability.

When Free Speech Becomes "Dangerous"

Ministers openly threaten to cripple X under the Online Safety Act. Not for illegal content, but for allowing too much free speech. Elon Musk's platform lets people say things the government doesn't like. That makes it a target.

A state that cannot enforce the law always compensates by enforcing speech.

The same officials who wouldn't act when Pakistani rape gangs operated openly for decades now want sweeping powers to police online conversations. The same authorities who ignored thousands of girls being raped are suddenly concerned about "harmful content" that challenges their narratives.

They'll use "safety" to justify censorship just like they used "community relations" to justify covering up industrial child abuse. Different excuse, same institutional reflex. Silence the truth-tellers, protect the networks.

Now it's scaled up nationally. Speech that threatens institutional power gets classified as dangerous. Platforms that won't self-censor get regulated into compliance or closure.

When Juries Become a Barrier to Justice

Labour's courts minister said the quiet part out loud. Sarah Sackman admitted they'd scrap half of jury trials "even if there wasn't a crisis in our courts." Not because of backlogs. Because they "need a better system where courts, not criminals, triage cases."

Courts, not criminals. Not juries. Not the public.

They're removing ordinary people from justice decisions because they don't trust ordinary people. Eight hundred years of legal tradition gets dumped because ministers prefer judges who follow government guidance over juries who follow their conscience.

Only one Labour MP voted against it. Karl Turner now faces losing the party whip for defending trial by jury. Dissent from the technocratic consensus and you're out.

So they've decided the public can't be trusted with justice. Just like they can't be trusted with elections, can't be trusted with free speech, can't be trusted with protecting their own children.

100% community funded, there are NO paywalls to access any of my work. I share ALL of my content for free. I ask, for those that can afford to do so, to support me with £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most - everything to help keep me going.

The Takeover Is Almost Complete

Each story alone gets dismissed as complex, nuanced, unfortunate. Together, they show a state eating itself alive.

Institutions that appease jihadists while arresting Jews. Police forces that recruit child rapists to meet diversity targets. Officers who don't just cover up for rape gangs but are the rape gangs. Allies fleeing because Britain's become a radicalisation risk. Civil servants openly plotting against elected governments. Elections cancelled when the wrong people might win.

The British state has become a protection racket for criminal networks, funded by the very people it terrorises.

I‘ve spent over seven years documenting this pattern in town after town across the country. Officials who'd rather arrest parents than the men gang raping their children. Councils hiring lawyers to silence rape victims' families. Police protecting Pakistani clan networks while children got trafficked in industrial numbers.

They called me racist, far-right, Islamophobic. Arrested me repeatedly. Tried to bankrupt me with legal costs. This is how dissent gets neutralised everywhere. Legal threats, financial ruin, social destruction. Same methods, different targets.

Now the whole country can see what we saw in Oldham. The same corruption that let 1,400 girls get raped in Rotherham is now running Whitehall. The same cowardice that protected grooming gangs is now protecting Islamist MPs. The same institutions that couldn't stop Pakistani clan networks are now stopping British voters.

Total institutional capture.

The choice is simple. Total reconstruction or total collapse. There is no middle ground left. You cannot reform institutions that view the public as the enemy and criminals as clients. That arrest whistleblowers while protecting rapists, that hire lawyers to silence victims while giving jihadists safe passage.

Seven capitulations in one week. Coordinated. Accelerating.

They're not hiding it anymore. They don't need to. The system no longer fears exposure because it no longer answers to the public. This is just the start. It will get worse. So the question I have is this - who or what do you think we are surrendering to?

Subscribe Now

I'm Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists.

🔴 Sign up to my newsletter. All content in 100% free.

🔴 Can afford a one-off contribution? Please support me here;
👉 http://BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
👉 http://paypal.me/RecusantNine

Raja 🙏