AYOUB KHAN MP ASKED AI IF I MISQUOTED HIM. IT QUOTED HIS OWN WORDS BACK AT HIM. THEN HE ASKED IT TO DIG UP DIRT ON ME.

AYOUB KHAN MP ASKED AI IF I MISQUOTED HIM. IT QUOTED HIS OWN WORDS BACK AT HIM. THEN HE ASKED IT TO DIG UP DIRT ON ME.

YOU REALLY COULDN’T MAKE THIS UP.

I've spent eight years investigating and campaigning to expose the rape gang scandal and the institutional failures that allowed children to be exploited. This week, I published two further investigations on developments in Birmingham.

The first included my analysis of why Ayoub Khan MP had written to the national rape gang inquiry just one day before Birmingham was finally added.

I traced the scandal back to the suppression allegations surrounding the 1991 Jesson report, the police intelligence identifying offender networks, and the repeated failure of authorities to confront what they knew. I also examined Khan's previous public statements about grooming gangs, ethnicity and community division.

The second went inside Birmingham's political establishment.

I detailed how council leader Roger Harmer had declined to support Birmingham's inclusion in the national inquiry, only to welcome it once the decision had been made.

I examined the political arrangements sustaining his administration, including the seven-councillor Muslim independent bloc, the historic handling of safeguarding evidence and the council's decision to attempt to publish selected historic records before the national inquiry deep dived into Birmingham.

And I exposed a striking chronology.

Khan warned against narratives that inflame division before Birmingham was named. Harmer issued a similar warning after the city was forced onto the inquiry's list.

All of this against a historical record in which West Midlands Police had warned that identifying offender backgrounds could cause significant community tensions.

That is what my articles challenged. Not merely what one MP said, but the political and institutional approach that Birmingham's national inquiry must now examine.

Ayoub Khan MP has taken serious offence.

He's spent the past day attacking me on X. My credibility. My motives. My funding. He's accused me of misrepresenting him, despite my publishing his entire statement for everyone to read.

Then, at 12:22am this morning, something extraordinary happened. Khan turned to an AI chatbot to ask whether he'd said that the ethnicities of grooming gang perpetrators should not be investigated.

The chatbot responded by quoting his own statement of 29 September:

"Rather than the identities of perpetrators."

His words. His statement. His name.

Now here's the remarkable part. Rather than respond to that quotation, Khan asked the chatbot to dig up what was said about me in Parliament back.

Grok found allegations Jim McMahon MP had made about me in Parliament in 2022. Here's what Ayoub Khan might want to know. McMahon has since repeated those allegations, and made further allegations, outside the protection of parliamentary privilege. I am now taking legal action against him for libel. Those allegations are disputed and will be tested through the legal process.

But think about what Khan has just done.

  • A sitting MP challenges my work into Birmingham's rape gang scandal
  • He accuses me of misrepresenting his words
  • He then asks an AI chatbot whether he actually said what I reported
  • The chatbot quotes his own statement back to him.
  • And instead of dealing with the answer, Khan turns to allegations made about me by another MP.

Not the Jesson report. Not the historic police intelligence. Not the institutional failures. Not the questions about the identities of perpetrators. He wants to focus on me.

And all of this is happening while Birmingham faces a very real and very current child sexual exploitation scandal where a recent safeguarding report revealed 98 live child sexual exploitation investigations with six suspected grooming gangs operating in the city.

These are not simply historic allegations. There are 143 children identified as experiencing or at high risk of sexual exploitation in Birmingham in 2026 where the published safeguarding figures did not include a breakdown of the ethnicity or nationality of suspects.

Perhaps Ayoub Khan MP could find a better use for his time than searching for allegations against the person investigating him. Perhaps he could start by asking what is being done to protect those 143 children. Or what progress has been made in shutting down the six grooming gangs operating in his city. Or even why Birmingham's authorities are still facing questions about the recording and disclosure of perpetrator ethnicity.

Those are questions worthy of a Member of Parliament.

I've spent eight years investigating institutional failures surrounding child sexual exploitation. My campaigning for Birmingham to face scrutiny did not begin this week, and it certainly won't end because an MP dislikes my views.

Listen Mr Khan, your statement to the national rape gang inquiry is a matter of public record. Instead of asking an ai chatbot to defend you, why don't you join the calls and demand that the ethnicity data is released of the men the police are looking for that are gang raping little girls in the city you represent as MP

And for everyone following this exchange, I will be publishing a further article later today. Readers can judge for themselves whether I misrepresented the sectarian MP or whether he simply dislikes someone standing up to him.

Raja Miah MBE

Unlike Ayoub Khan, I am not on an MPs salary. I have no shame in knowing that the work I undertake is only possible through the support of ordinary people. Khan, his Mirpuri first cousins and the Pakistani clans can call me all the names they want. They cannot stop the reckoning that is coming.

I publish all of my work for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work.

Or buy me a coffee if you wish to do do;
👉 https://BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
👉 https://paypal.me/RecusantNine

If you had any doubt to the value of my work, just ask yourself why an MP born in Mirpur, reliant on a bloc Muslim vote, elected off the back of sectarian politics, is suddenly so interested in trying to desperately discredit me?